Pending Religion Bill

Previously Introduced Legislation


H.B. 376 (View PDF)

As Introduced: 130th General Assembly, Regular Session, 2013-2014, No. 376

Cosponsors: Representatives Henne, Smith, Hottinger, Grossman, Lynch, Amstutz, Hood, Huffman, Boose, McClain, Becker, Hayes, Burkley, Retherford, Young, Beck, Sears, Romanchuk, Barnes, Johnson, Stautberg, Sprague, Conditt, Hall, Scherer, Mallory, Adams, J., Brenner, Terhar, Buchy, Adams, R., Maag, Ruhl, Blessing, Green, Rosenberger, Thompson, Milkovich, Roegner, Hagan, C., Wachtmann, Hill, Blair


To enact sections 9.69, 9.691, and 9.692 of the Revised Code to enact the Ohio Religious Freedom Restoration Act.


Section 1. That sections 9.69, 9.691, and 9.692 of the Revised Code be enacted to read as follows:

Sec. 9.69.  Sections 9.69 to 9.692 of the Revised Code shall be known and may be cited as the Ohio Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Sec. 9.691.  As used in sections 9.691 and 9.692 of the Revised Code:

(A) “Burden” means any action that directly or indirectly constrains, inhibits, curtails, or denies the exercise of religion by any person or compels any action contrary to a person’s exercise of religion. “Burden” includes, but is not limited to, withholding benefits, assessing criminal, civil, or administrative penalties, or exclusion from governmental programs or access to governmental facilities.

(B) “Compelling governmental interest” means a governmental interest of the highest magnitude that cannot otherwise be achieved without burdening the exercise of religion.

(C) “Exercise of religion” means the practice or observance of religion. “Exercise of religion” includes, but is not limited to, the ability to act or the refusal to act in a manner that is substantially motivated by one’s sincerely held religious belief, whether or not the exercise is compulsory or central to a larger system of religious belief.

(D) “State action” means the implementation or application of any law, including, but not limited to, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies, whether statutory or otherwise, or any other action by the state, a political subdivision of the state, an instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of the state, or a public official that is authorized by law in the state.

Sec. 9.692.  (A) State action or an action by any person based on state action shall not burden a person’s right to exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, unless it is demonstrated that applying the burden to that person’s exercise of religion in that particular instance is both of the following:

(1) Essential to further a compelling governmental interest;

(2) The least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.

(B) A person whose exercise of religion has been burdened or is likely to be burdened in violation of this section may assert that violation or impending violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, regardless of whether the state or a political subdivision of the state is a party to the proceeding. The person asserting that claim or defense may obtain appropriate relief, including relief against the state or a political subdivision of the state. Appropriate relief includes, but is not limited to, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, compensatory damages, and the recovery of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.


to Keep ‘Religious Freedom Restoration Act’ out of Ohio, ABC'>Elizabeth Faugl, Commissioners Pass Resolution, Hoping to Keep ‘Religious Freedom Restoration Act’ out of Ohio, ABC

Franklin County Commissioners say keeping a “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” out of Ohio is their goal. They passed a resolution Tuesday in their weekly General Session meeting “affirming Franklin County as an open and welcoming county for all residents and visitors.” Commisioner Marilyn Brown said she wants the Ohio General Assembly to refrain from introducing […]

Ohio Religious freedom bill pulled by sponsors

Show me one reason the Catholic Church needs a law that makes it easier to break the law in OH

to Ohio?'>Could Az. controversial ‘religious freedom bill’ some fear discriminates against gays come to Ohio?

Copyright 2014 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

to Launch “Jim Crow-Style” Bills Against Gay Americans'>Inside the Conservative Campaign to Launch “Jim Crow-Style” Bills Against Gay Americans

If a RFRA is involved there is no “balance”

Bill would guarantee children would be endangered by religious groups– abuse, neglect, and medical neglect

Two Ohio lawmakers want to ensure the state courts are equally protective of a person’s religious freedoms as the federal courts and introduced last month a state version of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act.