Debates over RFRA sound like policy debates. Why? Because it turns courts into legislatures making their own laws for religious claimants. It is unconstitutional. http://rfrafolly.com/professor-marci-a-hamilton-the-religious-freedom-restoration-act-is-unconstitutional-period-1-u-pa-j-const-l-1-1998/
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2014-01-07 14:29:112014-01-07 14:29:11Substantial Confusion on RFRA’s “Substantial Burden” Requirement?
Professor Laycock in support of TX RFRA amendment (which would have removed “substantial” as modifier of “burden” and made the TRFRA a state constitutional amendment) Letter of academics.
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2013-04-16 20:16:162013-04-16 20:16:16Professor Laycock Letter of academics in support of TX RFRA amendment
Warning: require_once(/homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-content/themes/enfold/footer.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-includes/template.php on line 688
Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-content/themes/enfold/footer.php' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php5.6') in /homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-includes/template.php on line 688
