Good step but still waiting for Senators to stand up for victims from religious orgs and families
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-08-06 22:34:172016-08-06 22:34:18Good step but still waiting for Senators to stand up for victims from religious orgs and families
More propaganda failing to distinguish between extreme religious liberty and actual constitutional protections. Tolerance has to work both ways
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-08-06 22:21:452016-08-06 22:21:45JOAN FRAWLEY DESMOND, Tolerance, Religious Freedom, and the 2016 Election, National Catholic Register
Interesting statistic for the Conventions to take into account
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-07-15 22:01:242016-07-15 22:01:24Christopher Ingraham, The non-religious are now the country’s largest religious voting bloc, The Washington Post
Inevitable ruling in MS on its apartheid law for gays MS already has most extreme rfra in US.
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-07-03 22:08:372016-07-03 22:08:37Story Hinckley, Why the case against Mississippi's religious objections law was different, The Christian Science Monitor
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-04-05 23:26:552016-04-05 23:26:55SARAH WOLSTONCROFT,Local marijuana dispensaries are using a loophole that gives them protection under religious freedom laws, Daily Titan
The so-called bipartisan support for RFRA fell apart before the 2000 re-enactment because it is a tool for discrimination and extreme imposition of beliefs on third parties, as I document here. The actual hijacking is the Court's aggrandizement of its power through RFRA to impose its preferred social policies and second-guess Congress.
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-03-31 15:42:142016-03-31 15:42:14Linda Greenhouse, A Supreme Court Hijacking, The New York Times
A question only the "least restrictive means" test would justify.
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-03-29 21:57:572016-03-29 21:57:57Tierney Sneed, SCOTUS Asks Objectors To Contraceptive Opt-Out: Show Us Better Alternatives, Talking Post Memo
The oral argument in Zubik v. Burwell was yet another lesson…
http://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpg00adminhttp://RFRAperils.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RFRA-perils-logo-smaller.jpgadmin2016-03-24 14:21:282016-03-24 14:21:28Professor Marci Hamilton, Zubik and RFRA: A Short Lesson in Overreaching, Tyranny, and Ineffectual Government, Hamilton and Griffin on Rights
Warning: require_once(/homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-content/themes/enfold/footer.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-includes/template.php on line 688
Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required '/homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-content/themes/enfold/footer.php' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php5.6') in /homepages/0/d272215775/htdocs/RFRAperils/wp-includes/template.php on line 688